Texas Plane Crash - Suicide Pilot NOT Right-winger

We've been bombarded by the left wing media using the suicide/murder/murder attempt of Joseph Andrew Stack as a way to attack the tea partiers once again. They claim he is proof of how dangerous "tea baggers" are, and how loony the far right have become.

There's one problem with this sumation... and it lies in Mr. Stark's suicide note.

1. He mentioned hating Bush many times
2. He mentioned hating big business and greedy CEOs
3. He mentioned hating insurance companies and big pharmacuticals, claiming they were responsible for the 'murder' of millions of people in the name of profit
4. He mentioned hating organized religion, especially Christianity (catholics specifically)
5. He mentioned a quote that puts a positive light on communism and a negative light on capitolism.

THIS IS THE LIBERAL MANTRA!! Big business bad, big bad pharmacuticals and insurance companies bad, Capitalism bad, Communism, Socialism good, Religion/Christianity bad, Bush... anti-christ.

His rant was as far left as Pelosi. Hell, Bill Ayres would be impressed.

I don't know of any pro-communism/socialism, anti-religion, anti-big business, pro health care reform, Bush hating Tea Party goers.

Of course, I notice sites like MSNBC and CNN who've been pushing the "tea bagger" angle have removed the links to the suicide note. (Though you can still find it online by googling it.)

But what can you expect from those "convienent news only" news organizations? Not only are they misrepresenting this nut bar who murdered an innocent person and endangered many others because he was off his rocker, as a right wing nut when he is way far left...

but they also neglect to mention how the professor who shot and killed/injured her collegues, who was investigated for allegedly setting a pipe bomb in another professor's mailbox a while back... and "accidentally" shot and killed her brother... is OBSESSED with Obama and is a fanatic supporter of his policies.

Keith Obermann is really delusional isn't he?

I did something I rarely do. I watched MSNBC to see how they're covering the recent election.

this is what I got out of Olbermann

1. Scott Brown is homophobic

2. Scott Brown is pro violence against women

3. Scott Brown isn't conservative, he's playing the center

4. He only won because Obama supporters didn't come out

5. He only won because the majority of voters thought the Health care bill isn't radical enough, because the majority of voters are pro-health care reform... including a public option and such.

ok, well if he's homophobic, so are the majority if Americans. Sorry to disappoint you - but when brought to a vote, the majority clearly state they want to keep the meaning of marriage as between a man and a woman. In fact, it's not even a close race... it's an overwhelming majority, as we saw in California, a very liberal state.

as for pro violence against women? Oldman cited a rally where someone yelled that we should shove an iron up Coakley's rear. Once again, Olbermann agreed with an eyeroll that it was possible he didn't hear it. (once again they forget the rule that just because it's picked up by the mic of a person standing next to the dufas, doesn't mean everyone else can hear it over the crowd, especially with large crowds such as he pulled, as opposed to the crowd coakly was pulling.)

However he said, even if he didn't hear it, he should denounce it now. Where were you to denounce Sandra Burnardt when she said if Palin came to NY she'd have her gang raped by "her black bruthas". Where was Olbermann to denounce Madonna when she said she was going to kick Palin's A$$? where was Olbermann to denounce the disgusting jokes Lettermann made about Palin's teenage daughter?

Give me a break. Like anyone other than a liberal nut could take Olbermann seriously in this case.

So Scott Brown is playing center? Well if you think he's homophobic... how can he be center? He's not playing up to the pro-gay marriage voters. If he's playing center, how come he keeps saying he's Scott Brown 41... the 41st vote AGAINST The health care bill. He didn't say he was pro reform only not what they're offering... he said he's pro-killing the bill completely.

Which brings me to his point that Brown was only picked because the democrats aren't radical enough on the health care bill?

Really? So... the people want more... they want abortion in the bill, they want the taxes coming with the bill... they want the removal of Medicare from one state to pay off another so they'll vote for the bill... they want a public option.

That's why they voted for someone who said he's the 41st vote to kill the bill completely. "We want more, so lets vote for the guy who says he wants nothing at all! yay! that makes so much more sense than voting for the one who will at least vote to pass SOMETHING through!"

Not to mention... the majority of people WANT this reform? Seriously? That's why Obama's approval started tanking during the Health Care fiasco. Why do the majority of those polled say they don't trust this HC bill? Why are democrats, independants and conservatives alike fighting this HC bill at tea parties?

And about the fact Obama's supporters didn't come out... why didn't they? I mean, my god, we're not talking about some republican winning MA. we're talking about a conservative winning the land of Kennedy... the land of John Kerry... Hell, a man on this side of the red line won Bawney Fwank's deep Bawoo distwict.

How can Olbermann and Rachel Mad Cow be so delusional and still remain on tv.

Oh, I forgot... it's MSNBC. I was probably the only one watching.

Our soldiers will need to register as terrorists.

any soldier that returns from Iraq, are being targeted as terrorists. It is said when they return from Iraq, they will need to join some registry so they can "be kept track of".

they are also targeting people who attend these group functions, like the tea party. I'm probably on the list already for running this conservative blog. Hopefully my name is near my hero Sean Hannity. Lol.

that was another thing. Some dildo on CNN said she refused to cover the teaparties because the protests were anti-american.

So Liberals were crashing the republican conventions, they were protesting the war at every turn, they were belittling and protesting the white house for all 8 years of the Bush administration, they protested our soldiers calling them baby killers bombing innocent civilians, and complained when people implied they were traitors.

But now the conservatives have their own protests because of something they believe in... fake causes like carbon printing (that has been disproven time and again), so they can lower taxes as promised, only to raise them again in the name of "the good of mother earth." it's insane. People don't even realize how we're getting taxed right under our noses.

but I digress.

CNN claims they are the most fair and balanced of all the stations... yet this dildo refused to cover the teaparties because she says the protests were unamerican.

Are you freakin kidding me?

this country is going to hell in a handbasket ever since liberals took over. I don't even recognize our country anymore.

Freedom of speech, Freedom of the Press, Freedom OF religion (not FROM religion, OF religion), all are under attack.

Morals and personal principles are under attack. They're telling us we HAVE to fund abortion attempts... even for forigeners overseas, even if it goes against our religious morals and beliefs... and now they're trying to say Doctors HAVE to perform abortions, even if they believe Abortion is murder and are morally opposed to it.

something is wrong with this country... we are in very dire times indeed. I hope we wise up soon and get them out of office come 2012. we need a strong conservative leader. we need God back in our lives, we need morals and values put back into our country. We need to grow some balls and worry less about insulting people, and more about being a strong, and moral country who stands by our principles, who other countries look to in time of need, and fear enough to not consider attacking us, and to worry if they attack our allies.

We need to stop listening to these liberal nutholes on CNN and PMSNBC and start thinking for ourselves. Most liberals I talk to simply repeat what dildos like Chris Matthews say word for word. Maybe we conservatives tend to watch FOX, but at least we come up with our own beleifs and opinions. Liberals are like mindless drones who need to be told how to think by liberal leaders.

It's time to make a stand. I'm not condoning extremist behavior. I deplore that kind of behavior on all sides, conservatives and liberals... but we need to take a moral stand, and not back down in the name of being PC. that's what I'm saying. If we do that, there will be hope for the entire country.

People know more about Palin than they think

The left is sticking up for Damon saying he has the right to his opinions and he should be free to speak them.

But why is it that whenever the left gives their opinion... they attack, belittle, and accuse with no back research and no way to back up what they're saying?

Matt Damon called her scary but didn't say why...

Attacked that she governed such a small community like Alaska...

Population (2007 est.)

Alaska: 683,478
Vermont: 621,254

Govenor of Alaska was asked to run for VP
Govenor of Vermont was running for president

enough said about that.

Then Damon keeps bringing up the Hockey mom thing.

So you're saying Hockey moms are not smart enough to be anything more than Hockey moms Matt?

That a Hockey mom is defined by the fact she is a Hockey mom and not by her accomplishments in cutting spending in Alaska, or that she lowered taxes in Alaska, or that she was for implementing a plan to find natural energy in Alaska, or that she has an 80% approval rating?

The left keep saying

"We need to know more about her, we need to learn about her politices."

Well if you'd shut the crying baby that is PMSNBC up for 5 minutes... you'd learn all these things that I just told you.

You'd learn that she is NOT for creationism, she is for the open forum for debate on both opinions instead of shoving one or the other down people's throats.

You'd learn she is NOT for the elimination of sexual education... she is for sexual education, contreceptives, but she wants the inclusion of abstinence... the only 100% fool proof form of birth control. She is also against EXPLICIT sexual education... (As in talking to 11 year olds how there are places on a woman that feel good when touched.)

You'd also learn she is pro-life... with the acception of a woman's health.

You'd learn that She is pro union having been a member of the union, and pro small business having family who own a small business of their own.

If you would just shut up and listen, or do some research of your own instead of waiting for the Matt Damons and P.Diddys of the world tell you what you should know, you'd learn all of these things that I was able to find out in 5 minutes.

PMSNBC going through "The Change"

Chris Matthews won't be getting tingly over Obama anymore... at least not for MSNBC.

Matthews, and Olbermann (who won "biggest whiner" according to a TMZ poll), are no longer going to be co-anchors of political night coverage with David Gregory.

The news comes after growing criticism over the blatant biased from Matthews, and the constant "Right" bashing from Olbermann that has proven the two can not be seen as neutral during the heat of election coverage.

The height of the decision came after strong complaints about Olbermann's comments about the Republicans using a 9/11 victim tribute video during the convention.

he started by saying if the networks had done that, "we would be rightly eviscerated at all quarters, perhaps by the Republican Party itself, for exploiting the memories of the dead, and perhaps even for trying to evoke that pain again. If you reacted to that videotape the way I did, I apologize."

While Matthews was less criticised for his actions having been harsh on candidates from both sides, he is seen as impartial because of his comments about Obama's speeches. (You mean the whole tingle up the leg thing, and calling the speeches "the New testament" weren't neutral comments?)

NBC News journalists, who often appear on the cable channel, did see a problem, arguing behind the scenes that MSNBC's move to the left - which includes a new show, was tarnishing their reputation for fairness. Tom Brokaw, the interim host of "Meet the Press," said that at times Olbermann and Matthews went too far.

MSNBC did gain a slight boost because of their more liberal outlook, but it remains 3rd in ratings.

For more information on this issue, and for other reasons for the dropping of Olbermann and Matthews visit these news links.

The Washington Post
Associated Press
New York Times

US Weekly and Chris Matthews. Too funny.

Us weekly finally had to answer for the slanderous peice they did on Palin, with the cover "Babies, lies, and Scandal" and boy were they humiliated. (Pay attention to the part where she pounds him about the whole "trying to get an official dismissed, and the part about her husband's DUI 20 some years ago. His answers are priceless!!)



According to TMZ.com, Reports are that US Weekly lost over 10,000 subscriptions because of the article.

US Weekly CLAIMS to page 6 that it was more like 1,000... but they way they were hanging up on me when I called to complain, and finally admitted they were getting a LOT of calls about the article to the point they were just hanging up or sending complaints to the editor, I tend to believe the reports that it was more of a loss of 10,000 subscriptions.

Now onto Chris Matthews.

Chris Matthews has been quoted as saying Obama's speeches gave him a tingle up his leg...



The same guy who said his speeches are like "the new testament"

But, did any of you hear the tune he use to sing?



Huh.

Soooo....

yeah. What happened Chris? Suddenly the fact that he's had no legislative accomplishments means nothing anymore?